[Updated: Dec 8, 2017]
By EUGENE Y.J. TEE
What makes a leader effective? This simple question has been long considered the ‘holy grail’ of leadership research and practice. Not surprisingly, there has been no shortage of ideas, theories and opinions proffered as possible answers to this question.
Leaders should develop these seven (or eight) key habits. Not so, suggests another view – they should adopt principles from the classic Art of War by Sun Tzu in order to be effective. Yet another view argues that effective leaders shouldn’t base their strategies on a war treatise, but instead, lead with a touch of compassion.
There are at least as many ideas to this important leadership question as there are books and experts claiming to have the answer. We ask this question because leadership pervades many aspects of our lives. The effects of good and bad leadership outcomes resonate across teams, organisations and countries.
Everything rises and falls on leadership (and followership)
Effective leadership drives organisational success, but at the same time, leaders could also be blamed for failures and crises. From the successful turnaround of Apple’s fortunes by the mercurial Steve Jobs in 1997, to the scandal-plagued leadership of Dilma Rousseff that threatens to disrupt Brazil’s hosting of the Rio 2016 Olympics, we attribute organisational successes and failures heavily on leadership.
We judge leaders first, and scrutinise the organisation’s policies and procedures, culture, and team processes later, if ever.
There is a problem, however, in seeing leadership solely in terms of the leader, in that we end up ‘romanticising’ the notion of leadership. We put leaders on a pedestal, exalting and admiring them when things go well, and quickly knock them off their lofty perches when they stumble. Focusing on leaders alone only tells one half of the story.
While it is easy to point fingers at leaders, in reality, leaders operate in complex, dynamic systems that also involve non-leader individuals. Leaders grapple with systems that work against them, cultures that stifle their effectiveness, and conflicts with individuals who don’t necessarily agree with them.
The last point is especially important. Leaders would not be able to accomplish as much, or fail as miserably, as they would in their endeavours were it not for the individuals that are directly influenced by them. As much as leaders shape followers, in turn, followers shape leadership outcomes and their leader’s effectiveness.
Leaders need followers. Leadership requires followership.
The significance of followership
But why look at followers? Aren’t followers simply the compliant, submissive parties in the leadership process? Isn’t the whole point of leadership to understand and develop skills that allow leaders to lead teams and organisations toward successful outcomes?
The term ‘follower’ is in itself problematic. It implies a kind of subservience, passivity and compliance that is used mainly out of semantic convenience. Leaders lead and direct. Followers follow and obey. But this is not always true.
In reality, followers react, respond to, and even act against leaders and their influence. Consider the many accounts where followers have acted to shape the history of nations: the socio-political upheaval brought upon by the French Revolution, democratic uprisings in the Middle East, the Umbrella Revolution in Hong Kong and our very own Bersih rallies, to name a few.
Clearly, individuals experiencing the effects of leadership, do respond to what they perceive as ineffective leadership. Followers are the crucial other half of the leadership influence process. Followers are at the very heart of what makes leadership so challenging. Systems, structures and policies are in comparison, more easily changed than the reluctant and resistant hearts of men.
Granted, not every follower is an effective one. Some are indeed compliant and subservient. It is effective followers, in particular, who help amplify a leader’s effectiveness. Effective followers are those who complement the leader, collaborating with them in their leadership journey to achieve organisational goals.
Put simply, the kind of followers implied by the term ‘follow’, the individuals who are just there to be led – are not effective followers. Effective leadership demands a level of dynamism in its followers not found in passive, subservient, yes-people.
This might interest you: Lose The Yes Men
Types of followers
One classic typology of followers suggested by Robert Kelley shows the following types of followers:
Passive, dependent and uncritical of the leader. These followers comply with the leader’s directions to the letter, but often require external motivators in order to perform their duties. Sheep followers are driven by threats of punishment and the promise of reward in fulfilling their roles.
- Yes people
Active followers, who are dependent on the leader’s approval and orders. Unlike sheep, yes people don’t quite need as much external motivation to comply with their leaders – they are simply keen to please leaders. Yes people are unlikely to challenge their leaders, reluctant to disrupt the status quo and often try to avoid being seen as opposing the leader’s ideals.
Passive followers who are nonetheless independent, critical thinkers. Alienated followers are often cynical towards leaders and their influence attempts. They are not usually motivated to contribute towards the leader’s endeavours.
Active followers who feel empowered by their leaders. They are also independent, critical thinkers who are confident enough to challenge their leader’s decisions when necessary or appropriate. Empowered followers do not oppose leaders for the sake of provoking disharmony, but rather, do so in the interest of the collective good.
This might interest you: Is Meek Leadership A Formula For Making History?
Empowered, effective followers are important for two crucial reasons:
- They complement the strengths of their leader, providing the necessary support and scaffolding for the leader’s ideals. Leaders may be the ones crafting the vision and mission statements of the organisation. Leaders may also be the ones setting the tone for the organisation’s culture and strategic direction. It is oftentimes, however, the followers who are instrumental in helping leaders materialise their vision and mission statements.
- Empowered followers serve as safeguards against destructive leadership. The many personality cults that feature charismatic leaders using their influence for destructive, nefarious outcomes attest to the importance of empowered followership. Deceptive, charismatic leaders foster a false sense of security, conviction in the unethical and support for immoral actions that ultimately lead to the downfall of organisations.
History, too, is filled with accounts of this dark side of charismatic leadership – of leaders who have built destructive cults by exploiting follower credulity and rewarding blind obedience. The Jonestown Massacre in America (in 1978), the Aum Shinrikyo sarin gas attack in Tokyo (in 1995), and on the local front, the Sky Kingdom cult are just some examples of cults founded on uncritical, ineffectual followership.
Hence, follower credulity and uncritical subservience are often necessary preconditions for exploitative, destructive leadership.
Leadership and followership go in tandem
It is necessary to reconsider the meaning and importance of followers in understanding leadership effectiveness. The subservience and passivity implied in being a follower needs to be eliminated from an effective leader’s lexicon. This is not a call to disregard leadership, but a call to re-examine what we know about leadership and what factors contribute to it.
Good leadership needs good followership – followers who are not sheep, not simply yes-people, and not detached from the organisation’s broader goals and visions. Rather, good followers are those who are the active, engaged, independent and critical thinkers that form an essential part of any leadership success story.
Empowering followers to be critical, independent thinkers is just one of ways to safeguard against potentially destructive leadership outcomes that result from unchallenged compliance to dangerous ideals. In this sense, followers not only have an active role to play in the leadership process – but also a moral obligation to ensure that leaders are themselves leading ethically.
We can now answer the question we began in this article. Effective leaders are also those who develop effective followers. Good leadership depends on good followership. Great leadership is built on great followership.
3 key takeaway points and practical suggestions
The terms ‘follower’ and ‘followership’ suggest a passive, non-influential role in the leadership process. In truth, followers are themselves an important part of the leadership process, and react towards the leader’s influencing attempts.
Seeing followers as purely compliant parties in the leadership process paints an inaccurate view of who followers are, and downplays their contributions towards organisational success. How a leader sees followers in their organisation affects not least of all, who they choose to hire for their organisation.
Are followers simply there in your organisation to follow orders, or contribute towards its long-term growth and development? Depending on the organisation, leaders might want to reconsider which type of follower each potential hire may gravitate towards and make hiring decisions accordingly. Such decisions would have important implications for succession planning as well.
Good leadership requires good followership for two important reasons:
- To complement, support and execute leadership goals.
- To safeguard against potentially destructive leadership outcomes.
How much do you encourage or empower followers to present their own views and opinions for projects and tasks? Is voicing disagreement and alternative views encouraged?
Considering ways to involve followers to participate in joint leadership decisions may be helpful in enhancing decision-making outcomes, generating ideas for improvement, along with increasing followership accountability and ownership on tasks.
Good leaders know how to share in the organisation’s successes, recognising and appreciating the contribution of followers in the organisation’s achievements. Good followers recognise their importance to the leadership, and contribute in a critical, yet collaborative manner towards the organisational good.
If you are in a leadership position, consider how you can further acknowledge your follower’s contributions and accomplishments. If you take on more of a followership role, consider how your leader might benefit from contributions and efforts that enhance his/her effectiveness. Effective followers are also those who are good at managing upwards – that is, managing their own leaders.
Eugene conducts emotional intelligence workshops and seminars for both public and corporate audiences, and is currently working on research linking leadership, followership and emotions. Eugene has confidence that he will one day be a good leader… or follower. For more Thought Of The Week articles, click here. To engage with Leaderonomics on some of our training modules on leadership mastery for your organisational needs, kindly email us at email@example.com.
Dr Eugene YJ Tee is presently Associate Professor at the Department of Psychology, HELP University. He is the author of two books – “Of Bromances and Biting Cute Babies”, and “Mindfulness and Emotions,” and has research interests in the role of positive emotions and positive psychology in organizational contexts. Eugene enjoys video games and is currently binging a little too much on Netflix. You can follow him on Twitter @eugene_tee. To connect with him, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.